Commentary

Top 3 Things To Fight Climate Change

August 21st, 2007 by jayb

Here are the top 3 things that we need to do to fight global warming.

1.  Congress needs to pass a law that creates an economic incentive for lower carbon dioxide emissions. 

This could be in the form of a carbon tax or a cap and trade system.  Either way, once there is an explicit economic cost to CO2 emissions, capitalism can do what it does best: optimize business activity to reduce costs. 

The Bush Administration argues against CO2 regulation by saying we should let private enterprise solve this problem without getting the government involved.  Yet, the Bush Administration was sufficiently concerned about our energy problem to get the government to give oil and coal corporation tax breaks.  (Do oil and coal companies really need more cash?  We should have granted large tax breaks for renewable energy instead.) As a result, we know that the Bush Administration's opposition to changing the rules on CO2 emissions is not based on principal but on preference. 

We have been through this before and we know how it works.  Businesses used to dump pollution into rivers and lakes because it was a cost-free waste disposal solution.  Of course the costs were enormous but they were felt by property owners, health and life insurance companies, etc.  We decided to step in and change the rules so that there were costs involved.  Now our waterways are much cleaner and we are all proud of the result. 

Here is what it comes down to.  With today's economic rules, if I am building a new electric power plant I'm better off financially if I burn coal.  If I'm building a car, I'm better off focusing on power and size (as in more of both) than I am focusing on better gas mileage.  With today's rules, the economic costs of CO2 emissions are felt later and by others. 

So let's change the rules.  American businesses are ready.  For a list of businesses already signed up for the change, go to www.us-cap.org.

2.  Reduce your carbon emissions by at least 20%.
There are relatively easy changes to make that don't require you to give up your SUV or turn off your central air conditioning.  You can use less hot water, recycle more aluminum and paper, turn down (or up depending on the season) your thermostat.  Even better, you can put in programmable thermostats which will change the temperature for you automatically when you are not in your home.  Next time you are ready for a new car or truck, buy a more efficient one.  Contact your electricity company and request power generated from renewable (CO2-reduced) sources.  Or go ahead and install solar power.

20% is doable.  Many EnergyRace members have already accomplished this.

3.  Pay a little extra to reduce your carbon emissions by 50% to 100%.
Not ready to trade in your big SUV for a Toyota RAV4?  Not ready to spend $20k on a solar power on your roof?  I don't blame you.  There is an alternative.  Pay a little extra each year to have carbon emissions reduced on your behalf. 

An American family with an average-sized house and two cars emits 20 tons of CO2 per year.  So spend an extra $20 per month to reduce CO2 somewhere in the world to compensate for your CO2 emissions.

Don't let anyone talk you out of this idea by saying that it's a cop out.  Having your money do some good on your behalf is a sign of generosity and thoughtfulness.

The only catch here is to make sure that you spend your money on CO2 reduction that is effective.  There are good vendors and not-so-good vendors.  More on this in a follow on article.

Comments

lynn said...

Great list of three very important steps.  Can you give us some e-mail addresses or links so that we can take these steps right now?  For instance, who can we e-mail or what petition can we sign to let the president and congress know we want higher fuel efficiency?  And in #3 can you give us some links to the best vendors?

Posted on: August 25th, 2007 at 3:59pm

said...

Lynn, thanks for the feedback.  Here’s some further information.

The Environmental Defense group has a Congressional lookup tool.  You put in your zip code and the tool gives you the email addresses of the President, your two senators and your Congress person.  Environmental Defense doesn’t tell you what to say, they just provide the lookup tool.

http://action.environmentaldefense.org/EDF_Action_Network/leg-lookup/search.tcl

National Resources Defense Council has the same tool on their site:

http://www.nrdconline.org/nrdc/leg-lookup/search.tcl

On the question of fuel efficiency for automobiles, the two key players are in the House of Representatives: Congressman Dingell D-MI (who is not enthusiastic about the increases) and Congressman Markey D-MA (who is pushing for the increases).  The Senate has already passed a bill that includes efficiency increases.

Congressman Dingell doesn’t include on his House web page a way to send him email unless you have a passport problem or other constituent service request.  But you can email him through the House web site:

http://www.house.gov/writerep/

Congressman Markey does have an email link on his web page:

http://markey.house.gov/index.php?option=com_email_form&Itemid=124

I am working on a more in depth CO2 reduction vendor article that should be ready next week.

Posted on: August 28th, 2007 at 10:59am

Euclid said...

These are great ideas.  Ultimately, the best way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is to create economic incentives for people to reduce their carbon footprint, and to increase the costs of emissions.  Then, natural human selfishness, in the free market, will drive us toward reducing our global carbon footprint.  Regretably, I don’t see any indication that appeals to “higher moral responsibility” are causing people to change their habits.  So, let the mighty dollar drive the change.

Posted on: October 1st, 2007 at 9:46pm

energyhog said...

1. Don’t buy more stuff
2. Don’t use more stuff
3. Don’t throw away more stuff

Posted on: February 22nd, 2008 at 11:17pm

Chad said...

A strong link between elevated carbon dioxide levels and elevated global temperatures has not been
established. Current global warming theory fails to take into account Earth’s natural heat transport mechanism. The idea that global warming is in a runaway state is not supported. The Earth has experienced much higher carbon dioxide levels in the past. Comparing global warming to the environment on the planet Venus is inappropriate because the warming due to magmatic heat loss has not been factored. Analysis of factors depressing phytoplankton needs further investigation to determine why their productivity has declined so rapidly. Other forms of photosynthetic life are
responding to this minor uptick in carbon dioxide level by increased growth. This is a natural mechanism to bring the carbon cycle on Earth back into balance.

Posted on: February 24th, 2008 at 2:07am

Juvan Minguez said...

And add this up, check all your vehicles for smoke emission, save fuel too.
suv and truck repair part

Posted on: February 28th, 2008 at 11:52pm

JorgeBurgos said...

@Chad Care to pull your head out of the sand and provide some references to peer reviewed, academic journals to back up each of your claims?
I would be interested to hear more about this “natural mechanism” - is it related to the Hand of God?

Posted on: April 8th, 2008 at 8:06am

Joey Brown said...

Climate change is a very alarming thing. The only thing that can solve this one is that people should be considerate. Thats all. If they consider the earth, then theres no problem. right?

Posted on: May 9th, 2008 at 2:02am

Trackbacks are disabled on this article.

Post a Comment


The trackback url for this entry is: Trackbacks are disabled for this entry